{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "version": "2026-11-12",
  "arxiv_id": "2012.07436",
  "available": true,
  "title": "Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecasting",
  "outcome": "partially_reproduced",
  "outcome_label": "Partially reproduced",
  "headline_held": 2,
  "headline_held_earlier_code": 0,
  "headline_total": 3,
  "headline": "2 of 3 headline claims held; every headline check is a one-sided bound, not a match to the published value; some results were left untested for budget; legacy attempt: the plan was never sealed; claims were frozen only by their first result; at least one value was read from an excerpt the agent chose after seeing the output, not by a rule fixed before it",
  "qualifiers": [
    "bound_checks_only",
    "untested_for_budget",
    "plan_not_sealed",
    "evidence_not_bound",
    "agent_selected_extraction"
  ],
  "qualifier_text": "every headline check is a one-sided bound, not a match to the published value; some results were left untested for budget; legacy attempt: the plan was never sealed; claims were frozen only by their first result; at least one value was read from an excerpt the agent chose after seeing the output, not by a rule fixed before it",
  "assurance_level": "Legacy",
  "answer": "Does Informer (Zhou et al., 2021) reproduce? Partly: when OpenRepro re-ran the authors' code, 2 of 3 headline claims held within tolerances registered before results were recorded; every headline check is a one-sided bound, not a match to the published value; some results were left untested for budget; legacy attempt: the plan was never sealed; claims were frozen only by their first result; at least one value was read from an excerpt the agent chose after seeing the output, not by a rule fixed before it (checked 20 Oct 2026).",
  "checked": "2026-10-20",
  "report_url": "https://openrepro.org/papers/2012.07436/",
  "badge_url": "https://openrepro.org/badge/2012.07436.svg",
  "badge_alt": "OpenRepro: Partially reproduced. 2 of 3 headline claims held; every headline check is a one-sided bound, not a match to the published value; some results were left untested for budget; legacy attempt: the plan was never sealed; claims were frozen only by their first result; at least one value was read from an excerpt the agent chose after seeing the output, not by a rule fixed before it.",
  "evidence_url": "https://openrepro.org/evidence/arxiv-2012-07436-20261019T202050Z",
  "attempt_id": "arxiv-2012-07436-20261019T202050Z",
  "author_replies": [],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "attribution": "OpenRepro, https://openrepro.org",
  "disclosure": "Re-run by an AI agent under OpenRepro's protocol; OpenRepro has not arranged independent domain-expert review. The outcome describes what happened when the authors' code was re-run under the recorded conditions, not a judgment of the paper."
}